Medical scientists held about 92,000 jobs in 2006. Epidemiologists accounted
for only 5 percent of that total. In addition, many medical scientists held
faculty positions in colleges and universities, but they are classified as
college or university faculty.
About 34 percent of medical scientists, except epidemiologists, were employed
in colleges and universities. About 28 percent were employed in scientific
research and development services firms; 12 percent were employed in
pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturing; 9 percent were employed in hospitals;
and most of the remainder were employed in private educational services and
ambulatory health care services.
Among epidemiologists, 57 percent were employed in government; 12 percent
were employed in hospitals; 11 percent were employed in colleges and
universities; and 9 percent were employed in scientific research and development
services.
Medical scientists can expect to face competition for most jobs, in part
because of the attractiveness of the career. However, those with both a Ph.D.
and M.D. are likely to experience very good opportunities.
Employment change. Employment of medical scientists is expected
to increase 20 percent over the 2006-16 decade, faster than the average for all
occupations. The Federal Government funds much basic research and development,
including many areas of medical research. Although previous budget increases at
the National Institutes of Health have led to large increases in the number of
grants awarded to researchers, the increase in expenditures has slowed
significantly, causing expected future employment growth to be more modest than
in the past despite the faster than average projected growth.
Medical scientists enjoyed rapid gains in employment since the
1980s ¯reflecting, in part, the growth of biotechnology companies. Job
growth should be dampened somewhat as fewer new biotechnology firms are founded
and as existing firms merge or are absorbed by larger biotechnology or
pharmaceutical firms. Some companies may conduct a portion of their research and
development in other lower-wage countries, further limiting employment growth.
However, much of the basic medical research done in recent years has resulted in
new knowledge, including the isolation and identification of new genes. Medical
scientists will be needed to take this knowledge to the next
stage ¯understanding how certain genes function within an entire
organism ¯so that medical treatments can be developed for various
diseases. Even pharmaceutical and other firms not solely engaged in
biotechnology have largely adopted biotechnology techniques, thus creating
employment for medical scientists.
Employment growth should also occur as a result of the expected expansion in
research related to illnesses such as AIDS, cancer, and avian influenza, along
with growing treatment problems such as antibiotic resistance. Moreover,
environmental conditions such as overcrowding and the increasing frequency of
international travel will tend to spread existing diseases and give rise to new
ones. Medical scientists will continue to be needed because they greatly
contribute to the development of treatments and medicines that improve human
health.
An increasing focus on monitoring patients at hospitals and health care
centers to ensure positive patient outcomes will contribute to job growth for
epidemiologists. In addition, a heightened awareness of bioterrorism and rare,
but infectious diseases such as West Nile Virus or severe acute respiratory
syndrome (SARS) should spur demand for these workers. As hospitals enhance their
infection control programs, many will seek to boost the quality and quantity of
their staff.
Job prospects. Besides job openings due to employment growth,
openings will arise as workers leave the labor force or transfer to other
occupations. However, doctoral degree holders can expect to face considerable
competition for basic research positions and for research grants. If the number
of advanced degrees awarded continues to grow, applicants are likely to face
even more competition.
Although medical scientists can expect competition for jobs, those with both
doctoral and medical degrees are likely to experience very good opportunities.
As funding for research becomes more difficult to obtain, those with both a
biological and professional medical background will have a distinct advantage.
Opportunities in epidemiology also should be highly competitive, as the number
of available positions will continue to be limited.
Medical scientists and epidemiologists are less likely to lose their jobs
during recessions than are those in many other occupations because they are
employed on long-term research projects. However, a recession could influence
the amount of money allocated to new research and development, particularly in
areas of risky or innovative medical research. A recession also could limit
extensions or renewals of existing projects.